Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Is research fraud deliberate?
Is research fraud / serious misconduct in medicine deliberate or inadvertent? This is clearly an important question and one that is subject to a lot of controversy. Many researchers seem to believe that fraud is always either the result of some kind of psychiatric condition, or just at one extreme of a spectrum of inadvertent error. How do we find out? We could ask fraudulent researchers, but would probably not get honest answers.
The ingenious study by Steen published in this issue points towards fraud often being deliberate (see page 113). Steen's sample are all papers retracted from the PubMed database between 2000 and 2010. He divides these up in papers retracted due to error and papers retracted due to fraud and hypothesises that if fraud is deliberate then we can expect that “… fraudulent authors target journals with a high impact factor (IF), have other fraudulent publications, diffuse responsibility across many co-authors, delay retracting fraudulent papers …
Linked Articles
- Genetics
- Research ethics
- Global medical ethics
- Commentary
- Law, ethics and medicine
Other content recommended for you
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Highlights from this issue
- Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- ‘Unfocused groups’: lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines
- Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
- Catalogue of errors in papers reporting clinical trials
- Facebook: can it be a diagnostic tool for neurologists?
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?