Article info
PDFPostScript
Response
A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
- Correspondence to Dr David Shaw, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK; david.shaw{at}glasgow.ac.uk
Citation
A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
Publication history
- Received August 6, 2010
- Accepted November 14, 2010
- First published January 20, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia
- Passive euthanasia
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- On acts, omissions and responsibility