Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Ethical practice in internet research involving vulnerable people: lessons from a self-harm discussion forum study (SharpTalk)
- Correspondence to Dr Siobhan Sharkey, Research Fellow, Qualitative Methods, PenCLAHRC Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter EX2 4SG, UK; siobhan.sharkey{at}pms.ac.uk
Citation
Ethical practice in internet research involving vulnerable people: lessons from a self-harm discussion forum study (SharpTalk)
Publication history
- Received July 11, 2011
- Accepted July 25, 2011
- First published September 24, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding factors influencing vulnerable older people keeping warm and well in winter: a qualitative study using social marketing techniques
- A mixed-methods study of challenges and benefits of clinical academic careers for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals
- Observational prospective study of social media, smartphone use and self-harm in a clinical sample of young people: study protocol
- Acceptability and feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial of medical skin camouflage for recovery of women prisoners with self-harm scarring (COVER): the study protocol
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the UK: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences and stakeholder engagement protocol
- Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers
- EFFICHRONIC study protocol: a non-controlled, multicentre European prospective study to measure the efficiency of a chronic disease self-management programme in socioeconomically vulnerable populations
- Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children
- Challenges and solutions: surveying researchers on what type of community engagement and involvement activities are feasible in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ExCIm)—insights of people affected by cancer and healthcare professionals: a qualitative study protocol