Article Text
Abstract
This paper will consider the right not to know in the context of psychiatric disorders. It will outline the arguments for and against acquiring knowledge about the results of genetic testing for conditions such as breast cancer and Huntington's disease, and examine whether similar considerations apply to disclosing to clients the results of genetic testing for psychiatric disorders such as depression and Alzheimer's disease. The right not to know will also be examined in the context of the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders that are associated with stigma or for which there is no effective treatment.
- Truth disclosure
- genetic screening/testing
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Other content recommended for you
- The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation
- Huntington’s disease
- Ten years of presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience of the UK Huntington's Disease Prediction Consortium
- Data sharing in the age of predictive psychiatry: an adolescent perspective
- Novel drug candidates targeting Alzheimer’s disease: ethical challenges with identifying the relevant patient population
- Running a neurogenetic clinic
- Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey
- A community based study on intentions regarding predictive testing for hereditary breast cancer
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism