Article Text

PDF
Paper
Language, foreign nationality and ethnicity in an English prison: implications for the quality of health and social research
  1. Can Yildiz1,
  2. Annie Bartlett2
  1. 1Camden and Islington Foundation Trust, Forensic Services, London, UK
  2. 2St George's University of London, Division of Population, Health Science and Education, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Annie Bartlett, Reader in Forensic Psychiatry, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE UK; abartlet{at}sgul.ac.uk

Abstract

Background More than one in 10 of all prisoners in England and Wales are Foreign Nationals. This article discusses whether the research applications to one London prison are aimed at understanding a prisoner population characterised by significant multinational and multilingual complexity.

Methods We studied all accessible documents relating to research undertaken at a women's prison between 2005 and 2009 to assess the involvement of Foreign National prisoners and women with limited English. The source of information was prison research applications and protocols. We also looked at available final research reports and journal articles.

Results Two key findings emerged from this study. First, studies at this prison frequently excluded Foreign National prisoners and women with limited English. Second, Foreign National prisoners were often clustered as a homogeneous category in the research reports reviewed. This is despite their diverse cultural backgrounds, their variable immigration status and their differing competence in English, all of which affect their lives.

Conclusions The failure to include and/or identify social subgroups of the population can undermine the value of research, including, in the case of the study prison, funded health research. This can compromise associated needs assessments and service delivery, particularly important in already disadvantaged populations; this may encourage and/or perpetuate a range of health inequalities. There is a pressing need to examine cultural exclusion in other health and criminal justice settings, to assess the ways in which—and the extent to which—such exclusion may compromise the merit of proposed and completed health and social research.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the This study was conducted with the ethical approval of Essex 2 Research Ethics Committee (NRES). We also received ethical approval from the studied prison.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.