Article info
PDFTheoretical ethics
Principles of biomedical ethics symposium
Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts
- Correspondence to Dr Oliver Rauprich, Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Markstrasse 258a, D-44799 Bochum, Germany; oliver.rauprich{at}rub.de
Citation
Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts
Publication history
- Received July 22, 2010
- Accepted October 4, 2010
- First published September 21, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Ethics in epidemiology and public health I. Technical terms
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- The problem of ‘thick in status, thin in content’ in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability