Article Text
Abstract
Can the view that medical science is more important than the individual properly persuade recruitment to trials? This paper considers the nature and interests of the person and their relationships to the concepts of science and society; and analyses a conception of value used to balance the interests of science and research subjects. The implications of arguments opposing the primacy of the individual are set out to indicate their implausibility; while the primacy principle is described to show its necessity in any moral society. Finally, the importance of fully informed consent to participate is explained with the requirement that the individual human life provide the criteria of moral value for human life.
- Informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Laboratory animals and the art of empathy
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of clinical research on children
- The moral primacy of the human being: a reply to Parker
- Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva