Article info
The concise argument
The concise argument
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published May 6, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
- Paying lip service to publication ethics: scientific publishing practices and the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World
- Findings from a Delphi exercise regarding conflicts of interests, general practitioners and safeguarding children: ‘Listen carefully, judge slowly’
- Highlights from this issue
- Conflicting clinical duties
- The making of medical ethics
- Understanding general practitioners' conflicts of interests and the paramountcy principle in safeguarding children
- Removal of doctors from practice for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand
- What if… your research is suddenly affiliated with a tobacco manufacturing company?
- Cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use among university students in Queensland, Australia and New Zealand: results of two cross-sectional surveys