Article info
The concise argument
The concise argument
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published March 25, 2010.
Online issue publication
March 25, 2010
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Translational ethics? The theory–practice gap in medical ethics
- Why is informed consent important?
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
- The evaluation of complex clinical trial protocols: resources available to research ethics committees and the use of clinical trial registries—a case study
- Why not common morality?
- Do we need research ethics committees?
- What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics
- Good and not so good medical ethics
- A global affair