Assisted suicide by oxygen deprivation with helium at a Swiss right-to-die organisation
- 1Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands
- 2University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- 3Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Correspondence to Russel D Ogden, 207 Osborne Avenue, New Westminster, BC V3L 1Y7, Canada;
- Received 7 August 2009
- Revised 1 November 2009
- Accepted 5 November 2009
Background In Switzerland, right-to-die organisations assist their members with suicide by lethal drugs, usually barbiturates. One organisation, Dignitas, has experimented with oxygen deprivation as an alternative to sodium pentobarbital.
Objective To analyse the process of assisted suicide by oxygen deprivation with helium and a common face mask and reservoir bag.
Method This study examined four cases of assisted suicide by oxygen deprivation using helium delivered via a face mask. Videos of the deaths were provided by the Zurich police. Dignitas provided protocol and consent information.
Results One man and three women were assisted to death by oxygen deprivation. There was wide variation in the time to unconsciousness and the time to death, probably due to the poor mask fit. Swiss law prevented attendants from effectively managing the face mask apparatus. Purposeless movements of the extremities were disconcerting for Dignitas attendants, who are accustomed to assisting suicide with barbiturates. None of the dying individuals attempted self-rescue.
Conclusions The dying process of oxygen deprivation with helium is potentially quick and appears painless. It also bypasses the prescribing role of physicians, effectively demedicalising assisted suicide. Oxygen deprivation with a face mask is not acceptable because leaks are difficult to control and it may not eliminate rebreathing. These factors will extend time to unconsciousness and time to death. A hood method could reduce the problem of mask fit. With a hood, a flow rate of helium sufficient to provide continuous washout of expired gases would remedy problems observed with the mask.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics exemption was obtained at the corresponding author's place of employment on 16 April 2008.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.