rss
J Med Ethics 2010;36:111-115 doi:10.1136/jme.2009.031708
  • Research ethics

Hidden risks associated with clinical trials in developing countries

  1. Cláudio Lorenzo1,
  2. Volnei Garrafa2,
  3. Jan Helge Solbakk3,4,
  4. Susana Vidal5
  1. 1Department of Public Health, University of Brasília, Brazil Post-Graduation Program of Bioethics, Brasília, Brazil
  2. 2UNESCO Chair of Bioethics, Post-Graduation Program of Bioethics, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
  3. 3Section for Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  4. 4Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  5. 5UNESCO Regional Programme of Bioethics and Ethics of Science, SHS Sector, UNESCO Regional Office for Science, Montevideo, Uruguay
  1. Correspondence to Professor Cláudio Lorenzo, Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Bioética, NEPeB, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF – Brasil Caixa Postal 04451, CEP 70.904-970, Brazil; claudiolorenzo{at}unb.br
  • Received 17 June 2009
  • Revised 3 November 2009
  • Accepted 5 November 2009

Abstract

The academic literature in research ethics has been marked in the past decade by a much broader focus on the need for the protection of developing communities subjected to international clinical trials. Because of the proximity of the revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, completed in October 2008, most papers have addressed the issue of a double standard of care following the use of placebo. However, other no less important issues, such as interactions between the lifestyles structures of low-income communities and the efficiency of risk-minimising procedures also deserve attention. The purpose of this paper is to discuss forms of uncertainty involved in clinical trials in poor and low-income countries that are not addressed by conventional methods of risk assessment. Furthermore, the increase in size of risks that are identified by conventional assessment methods will be addressed. Besides, the difficulty in properly applying risk-minimising procedures will be discussed. Finally, this paper proposes the involvement of research ethics committees in the risk evaluation process and the establishment of national ethics evaluation systems.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.