Article info
Ethics
Paper
Pulling the heartstrings, arguing the case: a narrative response to the issue of moral agency in moral distress
- Correspondence to Aileen Walsh, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Capital Park, Fulbourn, Cambridge CB21 5XA, UK; aileen.walsh{at}anglia.ac.uk
Citation
Pulling the heartstrings, arguing the case: a narrative response to the issue of moral agency in moral distress
Publication history
- Received March 1, 2010
- Revised June 15, 2010
- Accepted July 8, 2010
- First published September 3, 2010.
Online issue publication
November 26, 2010
Article Versions
- Previous version (3 September 2010).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada
- Moral uncertainty and distress about voluntary assisted dying prior to legalisation and the implications for post-legalisation practice: a qualitative study of palliative and hospice care providers in Queensland, Australia
- Moral and exhausting distress working in the frontline of COVID-19: a Swedish survey during the first wave in four healthcare settings
- Moral distress in veterinarians
- Navigating moral distress using the moral distress map
- Support for clinicians with moral loss after the pandemic
- Moral distress related to ethical dilemmas among Spanish podiatrists
- Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
- Ethics consultation in paediatric and adult emergency departments: an assessment of clinical, ethical, learning and resource needs
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription