rss
J Med Ethics 2010;36:12-18 doi:10.1136/jme.2009.032821
  • Paper
  • Clinical ethics

Healthcare workers’ perceptions of the duty to work during an influenza pandemic

  1. S Damery1,
  2. H Draper2,
  3. S Wilson1,
  4. S Greenfield1,
  5. J Ives2,
  6. J Parry3,
  7. J Petts4,
  8. T Sorell5
  1. 1
    Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2
    Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3
    Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  4. 4
    School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5
    Centre for the Study of Global Ethics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah Damery, Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK; s.l.damery{at}bham.ac.uk
  • Received 25 August 2009
  • Revised 28 September 2009
  • Accepted 5 October 2009

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are often assumed to have a duty to work, even if faced with personal risk. This is particularly so for professionals (doctors and nurses). However, the health service also depends on non-professionals, such as porters, cooks and cleaners. The duty to work is currently under scrutiny because of the ongoing challenge of responding to pandemic influenza, where an effective response depends on most uninfected HCWs continuing to work, despite personal risk. This paper reports findings of a survey of HCWs (n = 1032) conducted across three National Health Service trusts in the West Midlands, UK, to establish whether HCWs’ likelihood of working during a pandemic is associated with views about the duty to work. The sense that HCWs felt that they had a duty to work despite personal risk emerged strongly regardless of professional status. Besides a strong sense that everyone should pull together, all kinds of HCWs recognised a duty to work even in difficult circumstances, which correlated strongly with their stated likelihood of working. This suggests that HCWs’ decisions about whether or not they are prepared to work during a pandemic are closely linked to their sense of duty. However, respondents’ sense of the duty to work may conflict with their sense of duty to family, as well as other factors such as a perceived lack of reciprocity from their employers. Interestingly, nearly 25% of doctors did not consider that they had a duty to work where doing so would pose risks to themselves or their families.

Footnotes

  • Funding This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) through the Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme. This paper represents independent research commissioned by the NIHR. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.