Article Text

PDF
Research ethics
Ethics and methods in surgical trials
  1. C M Ashton1,
  2. N P Wray1,
  3. A F Jarman1,
  4. J M Kolman2,3,
  5. D M Wenner1,3,
  6. B A Brody2,3
  1. 1
    Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2
    Center for Ethics, Medicine and Public Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  3. 3
    Department of Philosophy, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr C M Ashton, 6550 Fannin Street, SM 1105, Houston, TX 77030, USA; cashton{at}tmhs.org

Abstract

This paper focuses on invasive therapeutic procedures, defined as procedures requiring the introduction of hands, instruments, or devices into the body via incisions or punctures of the skin or mucous membranes performed with the intent of changing the natural history of a human disease or condition for the better. Ethical and methodological concerns have been expressed about studies designed to evaluate the effects of invasive therapeutic procedures. Can such studies meet the same standards demanded of those, for example, evaluating pharmaceutical agents? This paper describes a research project aimed at examining the interplay and sometimes apparent conflict between ethical standards for human research and standards for methodological rigor in trials of invasive procedures. The paper discusses how the authors plan to develop a set of consensus standards that, if met, would result in substantial and much-needed improvements in the methodological and ethical quality of such trials.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.