Article info
PDFControversy
Euthanasia and eudaimonia
- Correspondence to David M Shaw, Faculty of Medicine Dental School, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK; d.shaw{at}dental.gla.ac.uk
Citation
Euthanasia and eudaimonia
Publication history
- Received December 17, 2008
- Revised May 4, 2009
- Accepted June 5, 2009
- First published August 28, 2009.
Online issue publication
January 06, 2017
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Mario Monicelli's Grande Guerra: the right of living and the choice of dying
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Assisted suicide organisation opens branch in Germany
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada