rss
J Med Ethics 35:497-501 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028555
  • Clinical ethics
    • Paper

“They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion

  1. A Ho
  1. Anita Ho, W Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, 227 – 6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2 Canada; anita.ho{at}ubc.ca
  • Received 27 November 2008
  • Revised 11 April 2009
  • Accepted 15 May 2009

Abstract

The notions of “expert” and “expertise” imply that some people have more credibility than others on certain matters. While expert authority is often taken for granted, there are questions as to whether expert power in some cases can be a form of epistemic oppression. Informed by bedside disagreements between family and clinicians as well as feminist discussions of epistemic oppression, this paper argues for a commitment to epistemic humility and the adoption of a two-way collaborative approach between clinicians and families that can help to enhance professionals’ own understanding of their theoretical framework and also promote responsive patient care.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.