rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:450-455 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027383
  • Research ethics
    • Paper

Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey

  1. U Swartling1,
  2. G Helgesson2,
  3. M G Hansson3,
  4. J Ludvigsson4
  1. 1
    Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden
  2. 2
    Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; gert.helgesson@ki.se
  3. 3
    Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Dept. of Public Health and Caring Sciences,Uppsala University, Sweden; mats.hansson@crb.uu.se
  4. 4
    Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden; Johnny.ludvigsson@lio.se
  1. Ulrica Swartling, Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, SE-581 85 Linkoping, Sweden; ulrica.swartling{at}liu.se
  • Received 10 September 2008
  • Revised 6 March 2009
  • Accepted 15 April 2009

Abstract

Based on extensive questionnaire data, this paper focuses on parents’ views about children’s right to decide about participation in research. The data originates from 4000 families participating in a longitudinal prospective screening as 1997. Although current regulations and recommendations underline that children should have influence over their participation, many parents in this study disagree. Most (66%) were positive providing information to the child about relevant aspects of the study. However, responding parents were split about whether or not children should at some point be allowed decisional authority when participating in research: 41.6% of the parents reported being against or unsure. Those who responded positively believed that children should be allowed to decide about blood-sampling procedures (70%), but to a less extent about participation (48.5%), analyses of samples (19.7%) and biological bank storage (15.4%). That as many as possible should remain in the study, and that children do not have the competence to understand the consequences for research was strongly stressed by respondents who do not think children should have a right to decide. When asked what interests they consider most important in paediatric research, child autonomy and decision-making was ranked lowest. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research has been funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS) and the Swedish Research Council (VR). They have had no influence over the research or the results. The authors have been independent from the funders in both conception and execution of the study.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethics approval: The study and its protocol (including the questionnaire) were approved by the regional ethics committees at Lund University and Linkoping University.

  • Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.