Article Text

PDF
Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
  1. U Swartling1,
  2. G Helgesson2,
  3. M G Hansson3,
  4. J Ludvigsson4
  1. 1
    Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden
  2. 2
    Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; gert.helgesson@ki.se
  3. 3
    Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Dept. of Public Health and Caring Sciences,Uppsala University, Sweden; mats.hansson@crb.uu.se
  4. 4
    Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden; Johnny.ludvigsson@lio.se
  1. Ulrica Swartling, Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, SE-581 85 Linkoping, Sweden; ulrica.swartling{at}liu.se

Abstract

Based on extensive questionnaire data, this paper focuses on parents’ views about children’s right to decide about participation in research. The data originates from 4000 families participating in a longitudinal prospective screening as 1997. Although current regulations and recommendations underline that children should have influence over their participation, many parents in this study disagree. Most (66%) were positive providing information to the child about relevant aspects of the study. However, responding parents were split about whether or not children should at some point be allowed decisional authority when participating in research: 41.6% of the parents reported being against or unsure. Those who responded positively believed that children should be allowed to decide about blood-sampling procedures (70%), but to a less extent about participation (48.5%), analyses of samples (19.7%) and biological bank storage (15.4%). That as many as possible should remain in the study, and that children do not have the competence to understand the consequences for research was strongly stressed by respondents who do not think children should have a right to decide. When asked what interests they consider most important in paediatric research, child autonomy and decision-making was ranked lowest. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research has been funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS) and the Swedish Research Council (VR). They have had no influence over the research or the results. The authors have been independent from the funders in both conception and execution of the study.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethics approval: The study and its protocol (including the questionnaire) were approved by the regional ethics committees at Lund University and Linkoping University.

  • Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Søren Holm