Article Text

PDF
HIV testing of junior doctors: exploring their experiences, perspectives and accounts
  1. L R Salkeld1,
  2. S J McGeehan2,
  3. E Chaudhuri3,
  4. I M Kerslake4
  1. 1
    North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK
  2. 2
    Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
  3. 3
    Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, Somerset, UK
  4. 4
    United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
  1. Dr Lee R Salkeld, Frome Valley Medical Centre, 2 Court Road, Frampton Cotterell, Bristol BS36 2DE, UK; L Salkeld leesalkeld{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To explore the accounts and perspectives of junior doctors who were offered an HIV test by their employing National Health Service (NHS) trust and discuss ethical issues posed by this new policy.

Design: Qualitative in-depth interview study.

Setting: 4 NHS hospital trusts.

Participants: 24 junior doctors who had been offered an HIV test as part of their pre-employment occupational health checks.

Results: The manner in which HIV tests were offered to junior doctors varied both between and within the NHS trusts. Overall, the doctors were highly critical of the way the HIV test was offered. Recurrent themes surrounding a lack of discussion and information regarding the indications for the test and implications of a positive result influenced the the doctors’ perception of their experiences. As a consequence of the shortcomings of how the test was offered, most of the doctors held the misperception that HIV testing was mandatory and many felt unable to decline the test. The majority of doctors referred to patient protection as adequate justification for being offered an HIV test.

Conclusions: Junior doctors offered an HIV test under new Department of Health occupational health guidance were disparaging about how the test was offered. The findings of this study affect thousands of junior doctors in the UK, and the impact of these results is extensive. Participants’ suggestions regarding how the process of offering an HIV test can be improved are discussed and ethical issues regarding the new Department of Health policy are highlighted.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Southmead Ethics Committee. Reference 07-H0102/94.

  • Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.