Article info
PDFPaper
Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- H Davies, National Research Ethics Service, 4–8 Maple Street, London W1T 5HD, UK; Hugh.davies{at}nres.npsa.nhs.uk
Citation
Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
Publication history
- Received October 21, 2008
- Accepted March 3, 2009
- First published May 29, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- More guidelines on research ethics?
- A syllabus for research ethics committees: training needs and resources in different European countries
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity