rss
J Med Ethics 35:348-353 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028324
  • Ethics
    • Paper
    • 1507

Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey

Table 4 Editors’ perceptions of the usefulness of available resources
Resource Mean usefulness score* (No)
All respondents Healthcare editors
Blackwell helpdesk 2.46 (13) 2.50 (6)
ICMJE Uniform Requirements 2.35 (37) 2.41 (29)
WAME 2.30 (10) 2.22 (9)
COPE 2.11 (36) 2.13 (30)
CSE 2.11 (9) 2.29 (7)
Blackwell Best Practice Guidelines 2.03 (60) 2.03 (32)
EASE 2.00 (5) 1.50 (2)
EMWA guidelines 1.88 (8) 1.71 (7)
Other journals’ instructions 1.84 (108) 1.83 (59)
GPP 1.80 (10) 1.89 (9)
  • *Usefulness was rated on a scale of 0  =  not useful, 1  =  quite useful, 2  =  useful, 3  =  very useful.

  • COPE, Committee on Publication Ethics; CSE, Council of Science Editors; EASE, European Association of Science Editors; EMWA, European Medical Writers Association; GPP, Good Publication Practice for pharmaceutical companies; ICMJE, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; WAME, World Association of Medical Editors.

This Article

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.