rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:337
  • The concise argument

The concise argument

Research ethics

Research ethics is one of the oldest and most discussed areas of modern medical ethics but as three papers in this issue illustrate it is still possible to advance the field.

Davies and co-authors describe a European workshop on research ethics held in Warsaw in April 2008 (page 382). Although all European Union and European Economic Area member states have adopted the same EC Directives on clinical trials and on good clinical practice (GCP) there are still very significant differences in their research ethics committee (REC) systems. Many RECs operate without common standards and audit and many are not sufficiently funded. The article argues that standard setting is necessary in order to foster trust between researchers, patients and the public and outlines a number of different ways in which standards can be set and performance monitored.

The paper by Dixon-Woods and Angell describe a research project which can be seen as part of such standard setting and performance monitoring (page 377). In England and Wales research involving adults who lack capacity to consent is …

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.