rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:310-314 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027078
  • Global medical ethics
    • Paper
    • 1507

Ethical issues in funding research and development of drugs for neglected tropical diseases

  1. L Oprea1,
  2. A Braunack-Mayer1,
  3. C A Gericke1,2
  1. 1
    Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  2. 2
    European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium
  1. Professor C Gericke, Chair in Public Health Policy, Director, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Adelaide, 10 Pulteney Street, MDP 207, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia; christian.gericke{at}adelaide.edu.au
  • Received 13 August 2008
  • Revised 14 December 2008
  • Accepted 19 December 2008

Abstract

Neglected and tropical diseases, pervasive in developing countries, are important contributors to global health inequalities. They remain largely untreated due to lack of effective and affordable treatments. Resource-poor countries cannot afford to develop the public health interventions needed to control neglected diseases. In addition, neglected diseases do not represent an attractive market for pharmaceutical industry. Although a number of international commitments, stated in the Millennium Development Goals, have been made to avert the risk of communicable diseases, tropical diseases still remain neglected due to delays in international assistance. This delay can be explained by the form international cooperation has generally taken, which is limited to promoting countries’ national interests, rather than social justice at a global level. This restricts the international responsibility for global inequalities in health to a humanitarian assistance.

We propose an alternative view, arguing that expanding the scope of international cooperation by promoting shared health and economic value at a global level will create new opportunities for innovative, effective and affordable interventions worldwide. It will also promote neglected diseases as a global research priority. We build our argument on a proposal to replace the patenting system that currently regulates pharmaceutical research with a global fund to reward this research based on actual decreases in morbidity and mortality at a global level. We argue that this approach is beneficent because it will decrease global health inequalities and promote social justice worldwide.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: CAG has received research support, travel grants and speakers’ honoraria from the pharmaceutical companies Janssen Cilag, Eli Lilly, Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Laboratoires Biocodex, Roche Diagnostics and GlaxoSmithKline.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.