Article info
PDFPaper
Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- E Di Nucci, School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; Ezio.DiNucci{at}ucd.ie
Citation
Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
Publication history
- Received November 12, 2008
- Accepted January 15, 2009
- First published April 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Abortion and human nature
- On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- A future like ours revisited
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument