rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:276-282 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.025031
  • Clinical ethics
    • Paper

Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study

  1. N B A T Janssen1,
  2. F J Oort1,
  3. P Fockens2,
  4. D L Willems3,
  5. H C J M de Haes1,
  6. E M A Smets1
  1. 1
    Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    Department of General Practice Studies, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Dr Ellen M A Smets, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DE Amsterdam; e.m.smets{at}amc.uva.nl
  • Received 5 March 2008
  • Revised 9 September 2008
  • Accepted 19 December 2008

Abstract

Background: Discussing treatment risks has become increasingly important in medical communication. Still, despite regulations, physicians must decide how much and what kind of information to present.

Objective: To investigate patients’ preference for information about a small risk of a complication of colonoscopy, and whether medical and personal factors contribute to such preference. To propose a disclosure policy related to our results.

Design: Vignettes study.

Setting: Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, the Netherlands.

Patients: 810 consecutive colonoscopy patients.

Intervention: A home-sent questionnaire containing three vignettes. Vignettes varied in the indication for colonoscopy, complication severity and level of risk. Patients were invited to indicate their wish to be informed and the importance of such information. In addition, sociodemograhic, illness-related and psychological characteristics were assessed.

Main outcome measurements: Wish to be informed and importance of information.

Results: Of 810 questionnaires, 68% were returned. Patients generally wished to be informed about low-risk complications, regardless of the indication for colonoscopy or the severity of the complication. The level of risk did matter, though (OR = 2.48, SE = 0.28, p = 0.001). The information was considered less important if done for population screening purposes or diagnosis of colon cancer, if the complication was less severe (bleeding) and if the risk was smaller (0.01% and 0.1%). Patients’ information preference was also related to age, mood and coping style.

Limitations: Difficulty of vignettes.

Conclusions: Patients generally wish to be informed about all possible risks. However, this might become uninformative. A stepwise approach is suggested.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.