Article Text

PDF
Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms
  1. K J Jørgensen1,
  2. J Brodersen2,
  3. O J Hartling3,
  4. M Nielsen1,
  5. P C Gøtzsche1
  1. 1
    The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2
    Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3
    Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
  1. Dr K J Jørgensen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Department 3343, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; kj{at}cochrane.dk

Abstract

A study found that women participating in mammography screening were content with the programme and the paternalistic invitations that directly encourage participation and include a pre-specified time of appointment. We argue that this merely reflects that the information presented to the invited women is seriously biased in favour of participation. Women are not informed about the major harms of screening, and the decision to attend has already been made for them by a public authority. This short-circuits informed decision-making and the legislation on informed consent, and violates the autonomy of the women. Screening invitations must present both benefits and harms in a balanced fashion, and should offer, not encourage, participation. It should be stated clearly that the choice not to participate is as sensible as the choice to do so. To allow this to happen, the responsibility for the screening programmes must be separated from the responsibility for the information material.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.