rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:171-175 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.024679
  • Law, ethics and medicine

Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers

  1. M M Tieu
  1. Mr M M Tieu, Southern Cross Bioethics Institute, 1E/336 Marion Road, North Plympton, South Australia 5037; matthewtieu{at}bioethics.org.au
  • Received 3 February 2008
  • Revised 20 August 2008
  • Accepted 7 October 2008

Abstract

One of the major concerns about surrogacy is the potential harm that may be inflicted upon the surrogate mother and the child after relinquishment. Even if one were to take the liberal view that surrogacy should be presumptively allowed on the basis of autonomy and/or compassion, evidence of harm must be taken seriously. In this paper I review the evidence from psychological studies on the effect that relinquishing a child has on the surrogate mother and while it appears that many surrogates are able to cope with relinquishment, I argue that there are good reasons, grounded in empirical evidence, to support the view that the subsequent management of the relinquishment necessarily objectifies the surrogate mother.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.