Article info
Law, ethics and medicine
What does the British public think about human–animal hybrid embryos?
- Dr David Albert Jones, St Mary’s University College, Waldegrave Road, Strawberry Hill, Twickenham TW1 4SX, UK; jonesd{at}smuc.ac.uk
Citation
What does the British public think about human–animal hybrid embryos?
Publication history
- Received June 11, 2008
- Revised August 28, 2008
- Accepted September 1, 2008
- First published February 27, 2009.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- HFEA will defend challenge from Christian group on hybrid embryo research
- Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos
- UK regulatory body approves research using human-animal hybrid embryos
- Regulator gives green light to research using human-animal embryos
- MPs back scientists' plea to be able to create hybrid embryos
- Public support for hybrid embryos rises with knowledge, poll shows
- Regulator defends its decision to delay use of hybrid embryos
- Scientists plead for right to create interspecies embryos
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- New life for the HFEA?