Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
- Professor M Dixon-Woods, Department of Health Sciences, 2nd Floor, Adrian Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; md11{at}le.ac.uk
Citation
Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Publication history
- Received May 16, 2008
- Revised July 18, 2008
- Accepted August 14, 2008
- First published January 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
- Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
- An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees
- Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views
- Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK