Article Text

PDF
Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
  1. E Angell,
  2. M Dixon-Woods
  1. Social Science Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  1. Professor M Dixon-Woods, Department of Health Sciences, 2nd Floor, Adrian Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; md11{at}le.ac.uk

Abstract

We analysed research ethics committee (REC) letters. We found that RECs frequently identify process errors in applications from researchers that are not deemed “favourable” at first review. Errors include procedural violations (identified in 74% of all applications), missing information (68%), slip-ups (44%) and discrepancies (25%). Important questions arise about why the level of error identified by RECs is so high, and about how errors of different types should be handled.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: National Research Ethics Service; Economic and Social Research Council (grant number RES-000-22-1908).

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.