Article Text
Abstract
The Mental Capacity Act (2005) is an impressive piece of legislation that deserves serious ethical attention, but much of the commentary on the Act has focussed on its legal and practical implications rather than the underlying ethical concepts. This paper examines the approach that the Act takes to best interests. The Act does not provide an account of the underlying concept of best interests. Instead it lists factors that must be considered in determining best interests, and the Code of Practice to the Act states that this list is incomplete. This paper argues that this general approach is correct, contrary to some accounts of best interests. The checklist includes items that are unhelpful. Furthermore, neither the Act nor its Code of Practice provides sufficient guidance to carers faced with difficult decisions concerning best interests. This paper suggests ways in which the checklist can be developed and discusses cases that could be used in an updated Code of Practice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics briefings
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Best interests and potential organ donors
- Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- An introduction to advance care planning in practice
- The Mental Capacity Act 2005: a new framework for healthcare decision making