Article info
PDFPaper
Ethics
Should we enhance animals?
- Correspondence to S Chan, Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, and Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; sarah.chan{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Should we enhance animals?
Publication history
- Received January 23, 2009
- Accepted February 5, 2009
- First published October 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Lessons from Frankenstein 200 years on: brain organoids, chimaeras and other ‘monsters’
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- I'll be a monkey's uncle: a moral challenge to human genetic enhancement research
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- Infanticide and moral consistency