Article Text

PDF
Clinical ethics
Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study
  1. L Frith
  1. Correspondence to Dr L Frith, Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, The Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK; frith{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Abstract

Infertility treatment is a speciality that has attracted considerable attention both from the public and bioethicists. The focus of this attention has mainly been on the dramatic dilemmas created by theses technologies. Relatively little is known, however, about how clinicians approach and resolve ethical issues on an everyday basis. The central aim of this study is to gain insight into these neglected aspects of practice. It was found that, for the clinicians, the process by which ethical decisions were made was of key importance. It will be argued that this focus on the process of decision-making is more than just empty proceduralism but is based on and facilitates certain substantive ethical principles. In conclusion, suggestions as to how ethical decision-making processes can be supported and improved in infertility practice will be made.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Additional supplementary data are published online only at http://jme.bmj.com/content/vol35/issue11

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study received ethics committee approval from the regional Multicentre Research Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Søren Holm