rss
J Med Ethics 2009;35:32-35 doi:10.1136/jme.2008.024380
  • Norman Daniels symposium

The multiple self objection to the prudential lifespan account

  1. M Schefczyk
  1. Dr M Schefczyk, Universität St Gallen, Kulturwissenschaftliche Abteilung, Gatterstr 1, CH - 9010 St Gallen; michael.schefczyk{at}unisg.ch
  • Received 11 January 2008
  • Accepted 22 April 2008

Abstract

Multiple self approaches purport that to have equal concern about all stages of one’s life is not a requirement of rationality. This poses a challenge to the prudential lifespan account which Norman Daniels advocates in Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Daniels has criticised the multiple self approach in earlier works, most extensively in Am I my parents keeper? In Just health, he only takes up the issue except in one footnote, presumably because he is convinced that his preceding discussions settled the matter. This article argues that Daniels underestimates the force of the multiple self objection to prudential lifespan account.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • i I am indebted to Dominique Kuenzle for this point.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.