rss
J Med Ethics 2008;34:e18 doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023432
  • Research ethics
    • Electronic pages

The remote prayer delusion: clinical trials that attempt to detect supernatural intervention are as futile as they are unethical

  1. G Paul
  1. Mr G Paul, 3109 N Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; gsp1954{at}aol.com
  • Received 6 November 2007
  • Revised 20 April 2008
  • Accepted 30 April 2008

Abstract

Extreme rates of premature death prior to the advent of modern medicine, very low rates of premature death in First World nations with low rates of prayer, and the least flawed of a large series of clinical trials indicate that remote prayer is not efficacious in treating illness. Mass contamination of sample cohorts renders such clinical studies inherently ineffectual. The required supernatural and paranormal mechanisms render them implausible. The possibility that the latter are not benign, and the potentially adverse psychological impact of certain protocols, renders these medical trials unethical. Resources should no longer be wasted on medical efforts to detect the supernatural and paranormal.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.