Article info
Research ethics
Electronic pages
The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants
- Mr D I Shalowitz, Bioethics Program, University of Michigan Medical School, NI7C27/SPC 5429, 300 North Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–5429, USA; dshalowi{at}med.umich.edu
Citation
The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants
Publication history
- Received March 13, 2008
- Accepted April 22, 2008
- First published August 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
August 29, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children
- Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
- ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
- Taking it to the bank: the ethical management of individual findings arising in secondary research
- Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state
- Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
- Legitimate requests and indecent proposals: matters of justice in the ethical assessment of phase I trials involving competent patients
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation