Article Text
Abstract
This article discusses some ethical issues that can arise when researchers decide to increase the amount of payment offered to research subjects to boost enrollment. Would increasing the amount of payment be unfair to subjects who have already consented to participate in the study? This article considers how five different models of payment—the free market model, the wage payment model, the reimbursement model, the appreciation model, and the fair benefits model—would approach this issue. The article also considers several practical problems related to changing the amount of payment, including determining whether there is enough money in the budget to offer additional payments to subjects who have already enrolled, ascertaining how difficult it will be to re-contact subjects, and developing a plan of action for responding to subjects who find out they are receiving less money and demand an explanation.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Linked Articles
- Correction
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia
- Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
- What constitutes a reasonable compensation for non-commercial oocyte donors: an analogy with living organ donation and medical research participation
- Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study
- Quantitative valuation placed by children and teenagers on participation in two hypothetical research scenarios
- Thinking the unthinkable: selling kidneys
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence