Responses
Clinical ethics
Deconstructing DNR
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 1 September 2008
- Published on: 1 September 2008Defibrillation is Heroic TooShow More
Gelbman and Gelbman argue correctly that, as currently used, "DNR" orders are confusing and could lead patients to have appropriate therapy withheld. Their suggestion that we use more transparent orders, such as "no chest compressions," merits consideration.
However, I disagree with their contention that defibrillation is not extraordinary or heroic. Unlike their other examples- intubation and vasoactive me...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Scale of levels of care versus DNR orders
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study
- Are do-not-resuscitate orders associated with limitations of care beyond their intended purpose in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage? Analysis of the ABC-ICH study
- Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on patients with sepsis in the medical intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational and propensity score-matched study in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan