Perceptions of a mental health questionnaire: the ethics of using population-based controls
- 1Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 2Department of Environmental Health, Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program Landmark Center, Boston, MA, USA
- 3Department of Oncology, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
- 4Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 5The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA, USA
- Dr P Surkan, Exposure, Epidemiology and Risk Program, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark Center, 401 Park Drive, 4th Floor West, Rm 415, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
- Received 16 July 2007
- Revised 24 September 2007
- Accepted 2 October 2007
Mental health surveys are used extensively in epidemiological research worldwide. The ethical questions that arise regarding their risk of causing psychological distress or other potential harm have not been studied in the general population. We have investigated how study participants serving as controls in a population-based study perceived an anonymous postal questionnaire focusing on mental health and wellbeing. Parents were contacted from the Swedish Census Bureau as part of a larger follow-up study on palliative care conducted in 2001. Eligible parents had a child of the same gender, year of birth and were from the same counties in Sweden as parents who had lost a child to cancer.
Five percent reported being negatively affected. The principle negative effect on participants was that self-reflection reminded them of their difficulties. Of the 418 respondents, 52% reported that they were positively affected by study participation and 95% perceived the inquiry as valuable. These findings support the use of population-based controls in future research.
Funding: The study was supported by grants from the Thord-Gray Memorial Fund through the American-Scandinavian Foundation. This funding source had no involvement in any part of the study.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.