Article info
PDFClinical ethics
The social psychology of amateur ethicists: blood product recall notification and the value of reflexivity
- Dr J Wasserman, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, MS 41012, Holden Hall 158, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-1012, USA; jason.wasserman{at}ttu.edu
Citation
The social psychology of amateur ethicists: blood product recall notification and the value of reflexivity
Publication history
- Received June 8, 2007
- Revised September 21, 2007
- Accepted October 2, 2007
- First published June 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Blood product use for radiological/nuclear trauma: product development and US regulatory considerations
- Should men who have ever had sex with men be allowed to give blood? Yes
- Towards an appropriate ethics framework for Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS): learning from issues faced in diverse HDSS in sub-Saharan Africa
- US lifts 30 year ban and allows some gay men to donate blood
- Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- Why continuing uncertainties are no reason to postpone challenge trials for coronavirus vaccines
- Off-label use of bevacizumab in the treatment of retinal disease: ethical implications
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Can we accredit hospital ethics? A tentative proposal