Article Text

Download PDFPDF
What to tell and how to tell: a qualitative study of information sharing in research for adults with intellectual disability

Abstract

Objectives: To explore opinions and attitudes regarding the current information-giving practices in research involving adults with intellectual disabilities.

Design: Qualitative focus group study with a purposive sample.

Setting: An intellectual disabilities service within the NHS

Participants: A sample of 26 individuals including adults with mild intellectual disability, carers, clinicians, care managers and the charitable sector.

Results: Three main themes were identified: process, format, and content. There was agreement that there is a need for improvement in the process and quality of information giving. With regard to the content of information, there was little discrepancy between the study findings and existing guidance.

Conclusions: Information should be presented in different formats and prepared with input from appropriate professions. Additionally the roles of peers, carers and other professionals in the process of information giving should be considered.

  • research ethics
  • qualitative research
  • mental retardation
  • informed consent
  • focus groups

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you