Article info
Research ethics
The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- D Hunter, Lecturer in Bioethics, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Cromore Road Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK; d.hunter3{at}ulster.ac.uk
Citation
The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
Publication history
- Received June 23, 2007
- Revised August 8, 2007
- Accepted August 9, 2007
- First published May 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
May 29, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity