Article Text
Clinical ethics
Medically valid religious beliefs
Abstract
Patient requests for “inappropriate” medical treatment (violations of the standard of care) based on religious beliefs should have special standing. Nevertheless, not all such requests should be honored, because some are morally disturbing. The trouble lies in deciding which ones count. This paper proposes criteria that would qualify a religious belief as medically valid to help physicians decide which requests to respect. The four conditions suggested are that the belief (1) is shared by a community, (2) is deeply held, (3) would pass the test of a religious interpreter and (4) does not harm others.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Doctors’ religious beliefs influence their views on end of life care
- The perceived role of Islam in immigrant Muslim medical practice within the USA: an exploratory qualitative study
- Children of Jehovah’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s Witnesses: what are their rights?
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?
- Are my religious beliefs anyone’s business? A framework for declarations in health and biomedicine
- Human rights versus societal norms: a mixed methods study among healthcare providers on social stigma related to adolescent abortion and contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya