Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
- Franklin G Miller, Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland 20892–1156, USA; fmiller{at}nih.gov
Citation
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
Publication history
- Received June 12, 2007
- Accepted August 2, 2007
- First published April 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
- Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia
- For love and money: the need to rethink benefits in HIV cure studies
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai
- Compensating for research risk: permissible but not obligatory
- Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor?