rss
J Med Ethics 2008;34:357-360 doi:10.1136/jme.2007.021634
  • Clinical ethics

The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees

  1. L Williamson
  1. Laura Williamson, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 8 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; L.Williamson{at}law.gla.ac.uk
  • Received 23 May 2007
  • Revised 3 September 2007
  • Accepted 4 September 2007

Abstract

Bioethicists have recently expressed concern over a lack of quality control within the field. This apprehension focuses on bioethics expanding in ways that obscure its distinctive ethical remit and the specialist reasoning skills it requires. This thesis about the quality and conduct of bioethics may have particular relevance for clinical ethics. As one of the youngest offshoots of bioethics, the field focuses on the ethical issues that arise specifically in a clinical context. However, non-ethics specialists are increasingly involved in this field. This means that clinical ethics could be especially vulnerable to the quality control concerns articulated within bioethics. The growing public profile of clinical ethics means that concerns over quality in this area warrant specific attention by those concerned with declining standards in bioethics and those working in clinical ethics.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Research for this paper was conducted as part of a project funded by the Wellcome Trust (reference 07446) entitled Ethico-legal governance in health care.

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.