Article Text
Abstract
Background: Issues concerning legislation and regulation with respect to the role of nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide gave the Minister for Health reason to commission a study of the role of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions in hospitals, home care and nursing homes.
Aim: This paper reports the findings of a study of the role of nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, conducted as part of a study of the role of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions. The findings for hospitals, home care and nursing homes are described and compared.
Method: A questionnaire was sent to 1509 nurses, employed in 73 hospitals, 55 home care organisations and 63 nursing homes. 1179 responses (78.1%) were suitable for analysis. The questionnaire was pilot-tested among 106 nurses, with a response rate of 85%.
Results: In 37.0% of cases, the nurse was the first person with whom patients discussed their request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Consultation between physicians and nurses during the decision-making process took place quite often in hospitals (78.8%) and nursing homes (81.3%) and less frequently in home care situations (41.2%). In some cases (12.2%), nurses administered the euthanatics.
Conclusions: The results show substantial differences between the intramural sector (hospitals and nursing homes) and the extramural sector (home care), which are probably linked to the organisational structure of the institutions. Consultation between physicians and nurses during the decision-making process needs improvement, particularly in home care. Some nurses had administered euthanatics, although this task is by law exclusively reserved to physicians.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. The study sponsor approved the study design but was not involved in the data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The role of the contact person in the Ministry was restricted to the role of advisor without involvement in the decision-making on any part or aspect of the study.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was granted by the research ethics committee of the Academic Hospital Maastricht and Maastricht University.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Involvement of nurses in euthanasia: a review of the literature
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews