rss
J Med Ethics 2008;34:137-140 doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019448
  • Clinical ethics

Do family practitioners in Lithuania inform their patients about adverse effects of common medications?

  1. I Liseckiene1,
  2. Z Liubarskiene4,
  3. R Jacobsen2,
  4. L Valius1,
  5. M Norup3
  1. 1
    Clinic of Family Medicine, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
  2. 2
    Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3
    Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. 4
    Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
  1. L Valius, The Clinic of Family Medicine, Kaunas University of Medicine, A.Mickeviciaus 9, LT-44307, Kaunas, Lithuania; valius{at}bpg.lt
  • Received 13 October 2006
  • Revised 15 March 2007
  • Accepted 20 March 2007

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To investigate the extent to which family physicians (GPs) in Lithuania inform their patients about possible side-effects when a common treatment is proposed. (2) To examine the relation between physicians’ estimation of the severity and frequency of these side-effects and their willingness to inform patients. (3) To identify the reasons for informing or not informing the patients.

Methods: A questionnaire, presenting three hypothetical cases involving decisions about ordinary medical treatments and a series of general questions about information about side-effects, was distributed to 500 Lithuanian GPs. The response rate was 42%.

Results: The respondents differed considerably with regard to their willingness to inform patients about side-effects, but they informed their patients significantly more if the side effect was considered to be common and serious, than in cases when it was considered to be rare and trivial. The majority of the respondents informed their patients primarily to enable them to react appropriately to the side-effects in question. The major reason for not informing was that the side-effects were considered too rare to be relevant to the patient’s decision-making.

Conclusion: Information, given to patients about side-effects by Lithuanian GPs, is not in accordance with the principle of respect for patients’ autonomy and requirements of Lithuanian legislation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.