Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry
- Professor A Liégeois, Faculty of Theology, Catholic University of Leuven, Sint-Michielsstraat 6, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; axel.liegeois{at}theo.kuleuven.be
Citation
Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry
Publication history
- Received October 25, 2006
- Revised January 11, 2007
- Accepted January 31, 2007
- First published January 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Coercion and pressure in psychiatry: lessons from Ulysses
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
- Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- The ethics of coercion in mental healthcare: the role of structural racism
- Informal coercion in inpatient mental healthcare: a scoping review protocol
- Medical management of acute severe anorexia nervosa
- The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence