Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Dr N Crichton, Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Rd, London SE1 0AA, UK; crichtnj{at}lsbu.ac.uk
Citation
Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
Publication history
- Received March 6, 2008
- Revised June 17, 2008
- Accepted June 18, 2008
- First published November 28, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Lest we forget… research ethics in children: perhaps onerous, yet absolutely necessary
- Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol
- Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders