Article Text
Abstract
The history of the National Health Service research ethics system in the UK and some of the key drivers for its change into the present system are described. It is suggested that the key drivers were the unnecessary delay of research, the complexity of the array of processes and contradictions between research ethics committee (REC) decisions. It is then argued that the primary drivers for this change are and will be replicated by the systems of research ethics review being put in place at UK universities in response to the Economic and Social Research Council research ethics framework. It is argued that this is particularly problematic for multi-centre review and for researchers who switch institutions. Finally, some potential solutions to this problem and their feasibility are discussed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
- The Ad Hoc Advisory Group’s proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions